Related%20passage for Eruvin 189:13

<big><strong>מתני׳</strong></big> הבונה עלייה על גבי שני בתים וכן גשרים המפולשים מטלטלין תחתיהן בשבת דברי רבי יהודה וחכמים אוסרין

ruled: The halachah is in agreement with R'Jose, but Samuel ruled: The halachah is in agreement with R'Judah. But could Samuel have given such a ruling seeing that we have learnt: R'Judah ruled: This applies only to 'erubs of Sabbath limits but in the case of 'erubs of courtyards one may be prepared for a person irrespective of whether he is aware of it or not, since a benefit may be conferred on a man in his absence but no disability may be imposed on him in his absence';<span class="x" onmousemove="('comment',' Supra 46b, 81b, q.v. notes.');">²⁸</span> and in connection with this Rab Judah citing Samuel stated: 'The halachah is in agreement with R'Judah; and, furthermore, wherever R'Judah taught a law concerning 'erub the halachah is in agreement with him';<span class="x" onmousemove="('comment',' Supra 81b.');">²⁹</span>

Explore related%20passage for Eruvin 189:13. In-depth commentary and analysis from classical Jewish sources.